Microsoft's Free Antivirus and Secure XP

Microsoft will finally release a free antivirus called Morro. The antivirus will be based upon the original Windows One Care Antivirus. I outlined the original Windows One Care's features here. I've come across a few articles on the internet that basically state the notion that the Windows One Care antivirus engine was insufficient. However, in av-comparative reports, they found (here) that One Care received the highest ranking "Advanced+." So there is definitely some contradictory information on the internet. This may be because if Microsoft is going to offer a free antivirus, the product would go into direct competition with the current entrenched competitors in the antivirus industry with billions of dollars in revenues. The stakes are high since Microsoft is providing the free antivirus and it will definitely be downloaded by a large amount of people. These people may think twice about buying a regular antivirus product. I have also heard threats on part of the antivirus companies that they will sue if a Microsoft free antivirus program is released.
I think there is also another important point to note. If Microsoft bundles free antivirus software with their operating system, the industry as a whole will probably not benefit. This is because the current environment allows competition and an increased difficulty to attack the masses' computers. If the there is only one antivirus used by the majority of users, then hackers will test their viruses to make sure that the free antivirus doesn't detect their virus. Millions of computer's could be impacted in such a situation.

This is excellent news because Windows XP really needed a hardened Kernel for governmental use. This story has parallels to the secure Linux Kernel Developed by the NSA. The secure installation was called SELinux and you can read more about it here. The new windows XP will be used by the US Air Force to secure their Windows installations through Group Policy options etc. Interestingly, Microsoft representatives denied that Microsoft would provide a customized XP install for any one. However, the interesting part is the the shear number of contracts the US government has with Microsoft. Given the government's clout it seems very reasonable that Microsoft would provide such an accommodation. The other problem with a secure windows xp version is why can't the public also be given an opportunity to have access to the same operating system. Why does the average computer user have run a more un secure operating system version. The answer to this question may align with the fact that Microsoft has officially discontinued support for Windows XP. They have a financial motive to get users to move to their newer operating systems such as Vista or Windows 7.